Infected Worldmind

Politics and Culture. A Tonic.

Who am I?

A happy father. A lucky husband. A lawyer and development professional.

I blog at Between the Stations and occasionally contribute to Funnybook Babylon. My ever-expanding bookshelf is here. I infrequently write about food and take pictures.

That's everything.
Recent Tweets @jamaal30
Posts tagged "Eddie Campbell"
The performer’s story is the essence of jazz music. The question should not be whether the ostensible ‘story,’ the plot and all its detail, is worth our time; stories tend to all go one way or another. The question should be whether the person or persons performing the story, whether in pictures or speech or dance or song, or all of the above, have made it their own and have made it worthy.

-Eddie Campbell, from his “The Literaries” article on TCJ. Best comics criticism of the week. The comments are… well, what do you expect from comments?

It’s a great reminder that we’re still struggling to find the best way of talking (or writing) about the experience of reading/critiquing/evaluating/exploring comic books. I think a lot of people (and I’m definitely guilty of this at times) fall into the trap of talking about writers when we talk about ‘story’, when we should (and often want to) talk about the magical blend of writing and art.

Everything goes from grand to paltry.
Eddie Campbell, with the best response to DC’s planned prequels to Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ celebrated Watchmen series. There’s nothing else to say, is there?
We are a society that is weary with it all. We get more complete stories daily than ever before in history. We shuffle the pack to stave off boredom. Lists. the Months of the calendar of pregnancy, the names of the rooms in the palace, the planets, the nights of Sheherezade, the walk-ons of the Cheshire cat, the ninjas of Frank Miller, the Goddess Bahuchara Mata. Witty juxtapostions: the prophet at the farthest limit of human understanding plays out over the slave putting a spanner in the works in the Rube-Goldbergian plumbing inside the heart of Wanatolia. it’s a play-bauble being turned around and viewed from every possible angle. It’s not the ink line that is the virtuoso show, but the cartoon invention, the prodigious flow of ideas. The ink line serves the demands of clarity, of the ‘control’ that has been discussed above, and it speeds in comparison to Blutch’s because that also is demanded of it. It is liquid, and the ideas run as though out of a tap that has been left on, spilling out the supply of water necessary to quench the thirst of a careening dash through this Arabian fantasy.
Eddie Campbell, on Persepolis, Habibi and storytelling.

There really are only a handful of story archetypes, or of romance story archetypes (and a handful of western stories, of horror, etc) and what you are reading is a performance of one of them. To draw a comparison, the tango is one dance, but every performance of it is unique (and both the archetype and the performance are a ‘dance’). The tango may be different from a waltz, a quadrille or a four hand reel. As different as each performance of one of these may be from every other performance of it, each ends in its prescribed way, bar mishap. As an example, lest I’m not making myself clear, I see there is a new performance of Spiderman on film. You already know the story. Since the last time they performed it was only ten years ago, I cannot imagine that anybody half interested could not already know it.

So, the story is the abstract of how it started, who did what, and how it ended. Everything on the page, and things not on the page including the writer’s instructions to the artist, comprise the performance. The story may already exist somewhere else, in a movie or in prose in a pulp or a slick magazine. Be that as it may, that’s one performance and this is another. If you go and tell it later over the dinner table, then that’s another performance again, and yours could be better than all the others.

Eddie Campbell. The man speaks the truth. Check out his musings on romance comics of the 1950’s (essential reading) here, here and here.

Comics operate like soap opera, where every effect is caused and every price must be paid, and what comes next is all that matters. Everything is literal. A death is literally a death. We can’t just say, ‘oh well, it’s only comic books’ and resume business as if nothing has happened. The character must be returned for further commercial exploitation, and so the death must be explained away. Comic books being very limited in their range of invention, there are only four ways of getting out of the difficulty. A death must in due course be dealt with by means of a retcon, (the wiki entry gives these instructions believe it or not) a bad dream, mistaken identity or the character is simply replaced by a doppleganger who in every possible respect is the same as the person who is supposedly gone.

Why do characters need to be killed if they are going to be needed again? (you may innocently ask). Cheap fiction demands that the reader should, in the words of Oscar Wilde, ‘experience a feeling without having to pay for it.’ Thus the reader may wallow in the sentimental excess of suffering a loss without ever losing anything, even a character that didn’t exist in any tangible sense in the first place.

Eddie Campbell. I particularly enjoy the Wilde quote. On an entirely different subject, I’ve slowly been making my way through the Bacchus trades I picked up at NYCC last year, and…man, these are the kinds of comics one can spend a lifetime reading.